|
Controversy on Stellar Evolution
|
|
It might have been a discovery to tell tales about Stars but there has been enough evidence to show that it is not all true.The truth is yet to come.What we see is a mere discriptive way of showing how stars are visible to us from here through a telescope.But why does a telescope create such images.Are they just images or reality. Here we will come to see how it is not a reality If observed closely a star from a distance on Earth the magnifying power of the lens will tell where the star is.If it is close then it will show an image according to the power of the convex lens.Every lens has the power to show an image and not the original image can be acquired.Images are all superficial and not original.They are either enlarged or diminished real or inverted according to the distance between the object and the lens. The image which they say is a black hole is actually acquired when the object is out of the reach of the telescope.Only some of the light is visible which is due to the fact that light travels in space and a lot of distance can be travelled and therefore it is this light which becomes a nearer object for the lens and therefore becomes visible leaving a black hole in the centre which is the farther star not visible through the lens. Likewise the images of Giant star is another optical illution of the enlarged image of the star through the lens.This star is at such a distance that it creates an enlarged image which is why we see the star as Giant.Since stars travell through space it becomes evident that they have changed their positions and therefore the image of the same star changes with time because eveytime the position changes the distance between the star being the object and the lense increases and the image changes consequently. The White dwarf is the image which is the minute image of the star.It required a high power lens to veiw it.Again it is another image we get.There are no original pictures of stars only images can be aquired.Threfore this is an image of the star which is at infinity.When the star is at infinity the image formed is diminished and is minute.Calling it a darf star is illogical. Discribing a star's journey through images and calling it the death of the star requires some amount of effort.To be able to give it as theory when no exsisting theory of Physics has been applied is just not the right procedure.Providing a discription of what they see is not right.Exsisting theories of light,matter and gravity have to be applied otherwise it is not the Stellar Theory but a misjudged discription of what they see in images.It is important to note that it describes an explotion which is not there according to theories in Physics.Nasa has just two images of an explotion taken in 1987 and they don't look like anything but a bright star and of the star which has changed its position in the second image.It is wrong to go by images which change whith change in position of the star and describe the procedure which is not there as Stellar Evolution. Exsisting Theories of Light Light Image Formation Images of Supernova Explotion at NASA Black Hole Multimedia Images The images of Stellar Evolution are created on Multimedia. Most of the images and videos of Stellar Evolution are created in Multimedia.People unaware of this fact believe all that they see is true and happening children especially.When they don't have images which can be called real then why do they calim such a proclamation which has no good evidence.Nasa had given it on their site that there are no such images of Black hole.They have been developed in Multimedia.When they don't even have a good Black hole image then why is there such a theory which describes it. This article being a more clearer perspective on how scientific theories of Physics have not been applied in Stellar Evolutions needs your attention! See Also
|
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
Main Menu
| Home |
| Articles |
| Search |
| Submit Article |
| Contact Us |
| Donate to Wikibin |
