Technology and environment
Introduction
Modern technologies have a profound impact on the environment. As indicated by the I=PAT equation, the total environmental impact (I) is the product of human population size (P) times material affluence (A) times the resource use or pollution generated by particular technologies (T) used. Technology affects all three factors, i.e., the size of the human population (P) by strongly influencing the fertility rate and death rate, the standard of living (A, or per capita GDP, Gross Domestic Product) by continually stimulating economic growth, and also the degree of resource use and pollution generated per unit GDP created (T).Technology and Population
From a historical perspective, technological revolutions have coincided with population explosions. There have been three major technological revolutions, i.e., the tool-making revolution, the agricultural revolution, and the industrial revolution, all of which allowed humans more access to food, resulting in subsequent population explosions. For example, the use of tools, such as bow and arrow, allowed primitive hunters greater access to high energy foods (i.e., animal meat). Similarly, the transition to farming about 10,000 years ago greatly increased the overall food supply, which was used to support more people. Food production further increased with the industrial revolution as fossil-fuel driven machinery and fossil-fuel derived fertilizers, herbicides, and pesticides were used to increase land under cultivation as well as crop yields. In short, similar to bacteria that multiply in response to increased food supply, humans have increased their population as soon as food became more abundant as a result of technological innovations.Significant increases in human population also occur whenever the fertility rate exceeds the death rate for extended periods of time. For the last two centuries, sanitation and medical treatment technologies have greatly reduced death rates, causing overpopulation with concomitant environmental degradation and pollution. However, contraceptive technologies, by reducing the fertility rate, have the opposite effect of reducing population pressures and environmental impacts. In summary, depending on whether a particular technology causes a decrease or increase in human population size, it will have positive or negative environmental impacts, respectively.
Technology and Affluence
Advances in science and technology during the last 200 years have been the main driving force behind the more than 100-fold rise in global industrial output and the 450-fold increase in gross domestic product in the United States. Since economic output grew much faster than the size of the human population, material affluence (A) or per-capita GDP has increased about 14-fold between 1820 to 1989 in the industrialized nations. There are at least three fundamental reasons why new technologies increase material affluence. First, by replacing human labor with machines run primarily on fossil energy, labor productivities have risen dramatically resulting in increased production and concomitant consumption. Second, by creating new products and services never seen before, large demands are generated and fueled by mass-media advertising, resulting in increased material consumption. Third, by relentlessly increasing technological efficiencies, more industrial output can be produced with less input of labor, capital, energy, and minerals, resulting in decreased costs of products and services and thus increased consumption. The phenomenon that efficiency improvements stimulate material consumption of the very resources that were supposed to be conserved by increasing efficiency is called Rebound effect (conservation) or Jevons paradox. In summary, advances in technology have been the main driver behind increasing per capita affluence (A) and material consumption.Technology and Environmental Impact
The application of technology often results in unavoidable environmental impacts, which according to the I=PAT equation (see above), is measured as resource use or pollution generated per unit GDP. Environmental impacts caused by the application of technology are inherently unavoidable for several reasons. First, given that the purpose of many technologies is to exploit, control, or otherwise “improve†upon nature for the perceived benefit of mankind while at the same time the myriad of processes in nature have been optimized and are continually adjusted by evolution, it is clear that any disturbance of these natural processes by technology will automatically result in negative environmental consequences. Second, the conservation of mass principle and the first law of thermodynamics (i.e., conservation of energy) dictate that whenever material resources or energy are moved around or manipulated by technology, environmental consequences are inescapable. Third, according to the second law of thermodynamics, order can be increased within a system (such as the human economy) only by increasing disorder or entropy outside the system (i.e., the environment). Thus, technologies can create “order†in the human economy (i.e., order as manifested in buildings, factories, transportation networks, communication systems, etc.) only at the expense of increasing “disorder†in the environment. According to a number of studies, increased entropy is likely to be correlated to negative environmental impacts.The following is a list of various environmental impacts brought about by the application of specific technologies.
Comments