Grace Lyu Collins

Grace Lyu Collins is an American human rights activist and advocate for the self‐determination of the Naga people. Recognized as the Honorary President of Nagalim and the founder of the Naga‑American Council, she has worked extensively to bring international attention to the human rights issues and political struggles in Nagalim.

Early life and background

Grace Lyu Collins was born to a family of Korean origin that settled in the United States. Raised in a Christian environment—with her father serving as a reverend—she was instilled with strong ethical and humanitarian values from an early age. These early influences later shaped her passion for human rights and social justice, leading her to pursue studies and engagements in international human rights forums, including participation at the United Nations World Human Rights Commission.

Activism and career

Collins first became involved in human rights activism during her college years. Her interest in the issues of oppression and self‐determination deepened when, at an exhibition in Geneva, she encountered the plight of the Naga people. Captivated by their struggle, she dedicated herself to raising awareness about the ongoing human rights violations in Nagalim. Over the years, she has worked with Naga community representatives—including activists, church leaders, student groups, and survivors of human rights abuses—to build an international network of support for the Naga cause.

In her efforts to provide a platform for the Nagas, Collins founded the Naga‑American Council. Through this organization, she has engaged in dialogue with U.S. policymakers and international organizations to address issues such as the impact of Indian government policies in Nagalim, the consequences of security laws, and the broader demand for self‑determination by the Naga people.

Collins's activism has not been without controversy. Within the complex political landscape of Naga movements, different factions have sometimes disputed her role. For instance, the National Socialist Council of Nagaland (K) has criticized her, questioning both her motivations and methods. In contrast, other groups—such as the NSCN (I-M)—have defended her, saying that her efforts are directed toward representing the Nagas as a whole rather than serving any single faction's interests. This internal discord reflects the broader challenges of uniting diverse groups under a common struggle for human rights and self-determination.