Creocracy: A Project of State

Creocracy, A Project of State.

The term “creocracy” is coined by Dr. Frangi in 2008. Creocracy comes from the Latin creo, creare: to create, and the Greek Kratia, meaning rule. Creocracy, the rule of creative activities, is the first political regime in history which is based on creative activities, and not on persons. This means that the people vote for activities and not for persons. As an alternative, the people choose the creative activities they shall govern within groups. These activities can be one, as well as thousands. And this is possible through “group”, and not a person, or an individual association or a community. For the group is the only association that is peculiar to human being, as Dr. Frangi proves in Groupal Religion, the religion he is declaring. See La Religion Groupale, pour le salut de l’Humanité, Editions Universitaires Européennes, Allemagne (septembre, 2014), ISBN: 978 613 158 0840. A Group is understood as a pure activity, without a person, a history, habits, customs, or beliefs. The creocratic groups are constituted by dividing the number of the active individuals by the number of the creative activities chosen by the people. Each of the creocratic groups governs all the chosen creative activities by rotation for a pre-determined term.

Creocracy was published [in Arabic] with the Arab Printing Press in Beirut (Lebanon) in September 2008. It received wide press coverage and analysis in Al-Anwar daily newspaper for two years. Currently, Dr. Frangi teaches Creocracy in Lebanon as a solution, among others, to a constitutional issue he has raised, within his course “Introduction to Civic Law” (Introduction to Civic Law (2 tomes), Arab Printing Press, 5^th edition, Beirut (LB): 2021 (1100 pages)). The Creocracy is divided into three main chapters. The first chapter advances the theory of Groupal State, and its origin. The second chapter theorizes about the organization of Groupal Government, and the third analyzes the theory of Groupal Civic Education.

Frangi states the origin of Creocracy as follows: “There comes to my mind Galileo Galilei’s stance vis-a-vis Aristotle’s theory of motion. To the question what makes a moving body stop, Aristotle replied in Physics that it stops when the force that sets it in motion no longer acts on it. Faced with this answer, Galileo wondered why then the body would not continue to move forever. For the more the external forces acting on the moving body are reduced, as flattening its path, the more the moving body would perpetuate. Suppose that we remove all the external forces acting on a moving body, the latter would continue to move forever, for the same original force acting on it. Motion then is the essential, with the external forces increasing or decreasing its velocity. -- We can adopt here the same scientific approach. If I say that the state is represented by a person (artificial) like those who have created it, I do not see how we can free ourselves from the idea of ​​a state based on the notion of person. But suppose that we take off the creative activity, the state would vanish. Suppose again that the state faded away, the creative activities would persist; for the creative activity is given before humans, its existence being not dependent on theirs or on that of the State. Thus, the creative activity is the essential, humans the means, with the power to create increasing in some, decreasing in others. Accordingly, if we say that the state is creative activity in the image of humans’ creative activity, be it social contract or natural social will, then I see how one is able to build the state on the notion of creative activity, disarm the power, and give solutions of extreme importance to questions that all political regimes up until now have been unable to solve, only because humans have based them on the idea of person.”

Pascal Jerver/pascaljerver@hotmail.com