In the July 2009 Computer magazine, they talk about "Channel Email." Basically, channel email attempts to reduce spam by a simple handshake protocol (both have to agree to the communication before it will happen). So, instead of email automatically being received no matter what (sender having absolute control), the receiver would have to accept the email before they receive it (sender and receiver having control). There are no anti-AI queries (users don't have to verify they are human) in channel email (it isn't needed).
Three main modes
Initially, users of Channel email would be under the default "Accept All." In the "Accept All" state, any receiver will receive messages normally if they have an open channel with the sender, but if they don't have an open channel, their email client will automatically respond to all incoming emails saying please reply to this email, and here's what's going on (explain what channel email is and how it is useful). The sender would then reply to the email (probably have a unique code in the message so spammers can't just resend the email). Once they reply, the receiver would be able to see the original message (the sender wouldn't have to resend it). After that, all emails would be sent normally, until the channel is closed by either party. (then they would repeat the starting thing to reopen the channel). This step reduces spam, as the receiver has to receive emails to be able to send emails (which they usually don't).
Then, as users start to understand channel email, they could switch to "Ask," in which case they receive smaller messages that just ask them if they want to open the channel (they can then not accept obvious sources of spam).
Extreme users could also "Deny All," in which case channel email just never responds to the first message and just automatically deletes any emails not from an already open channel.
Transition from non-Channel to Channel email
This would be easy to transition to, as users that don't have it would just have to reply to an email on their first message to a channel email user.
-Non-channel senders would have to reply to an email, then resend their message (something they probably wouldn't mind doing, as the email they reply to would explain why it's happening), while
-Non-channel receivers would have to just reply to a simple message that says "lets talk about <email subject>." After they replied, the actual message would be sent.
Channel Email's stages
Channel email has four stages:
1) Channel Request/permission
- Sender sends email (very small message requesting permission to send the email ).
2) Channel Permission
- Receiver accepts the channel (or denies it, in which case the receiver just deletes it).
3) Message Transmissions
- Sender and Receiver send messages like in normal email.
4) Channel Closure
- One or both parties stop accepting transmissions (other party told of this with a short message if desired). No communication occurs until stages 1-2 are done again.
Notes that will probably be deleted after someone else reads this
Notes: I copied terms (1 or 2 words) directly from the July 2009 Computer magazine article for clarity. I wrote almost everything else myself after reading it once to avoid copyright issues (which is why it isn't as clear or convincing as the original article).
Three main modes
Initially, users of Channel email would be under the default "Accept All." In the "Accept All" state, any receiver will receive messages normally if they have an open channel with the sender, but if they don't have an open channel, their email client will automatically respond to all incoming emails saying please reply to this email, and here's what's going on (explain what channel email is and how it is useful). The sender would then reply to the email (probably have a unique code in the message so spammers can't just resend the email). Once they reply, the receiver would be able to see the original message (the sender wouldn't have to resend it). After that, all emails would be sent normally, until the channel is closed by either party. (then they would repeat the starting thing to reopen the channel). This step reduces spam, as the receiver has to receive emails to be able to send emails (which they usually don't).
Then, as users start to understand channel email, they could switch to "Ask," in which case they receive smaller messages that just ask them if they want to open the channel (they can then not accept obvious sources of spam).
Extreme users could also "Deny All," in which case channel email just never responds to the first message and just automatically deletes any emails not from an already open channel.
Transition from non-Channel to Channel email
This would be easy to transition to, as users that don't have it would just have to reply to an email on their first message to a channel email user.
-Non-channel senders would have to reply to an email, then resend their message (something they probably wouldn't mind doing, as the email they reply to would explain why it's happening), while
-Non-channel receivers would have to just reply to a simple message that says "lets talk about <email subject>." After they replied, the actual message would be sent.
Channel Email's stages
Channel email has four stages:
1) Channel Request/permission
- Sender sends email (very small message requesting permission to send the email ).
2) Channel Permission
- Receiver accepts the channel (or denies it, in which case the receiver just deletes it).
3) Message Transmissions
- Sender and Receiver send messages like in normal email.
4) Channel Closure
- One or both parties stop accepting transmissions (other party told of this with a short message if desired). No communication occurs until stages 1-2 are done again.
Notes that will probably be deleted after someone else reads this
Notes: I copied terms (1 or 2 words) directly from the July 2009 Computer magazine article for clarity. I wrote almost everything else myself after reading it once to avoid copyright issues (which is why it isn't as clear or convincing as the original article).
Patrick Wilson II (b. 1986 May 16, Canada) is a Canadian soccer player currently playing for Integral DAC Gyor in Hungary's NB II West. Wilson currently holds a Canadian and a United Kingdom passport.
Professional career
Patrick Wilson II began his professional career with Chicago Sockers when he joined the team for a European tour in March 2008. During the tour, the Sockers competed against FC Utrecht, Vitesse, Cambuur, Heracles, FC Omniworld, FC Emmen. While on tour, Wilson was offered a trial with FC Omniworld, which participates in the Eerste Division, Dutch second tier division.
After participating in six matches with the Chicago Sockers, Wilson joined Royal Racing FC Montegnee of Belgium's Provincial League from August till December 2008. Wilson appeared in 14 games with Royal Racing FC. In December, Patrick signed for his current team, Integral DAC Gyor SE of the Hungarian NBII. Patrick currently has made 15 appearances for the Hungarian side.
College career
As a freshmen at the College of the Southwest, Wilson started in all 16 matches and scored 2 goals. After his freshmen year, Patrick transferred to Cornerstone University where he participated in 46 matches over his remaining three years in college. Moreover, Wilson was two-time NAIA All-American, Newcomer of the year, three-time First Team All Conference, and two-time First Team All Region.
Professional career
Patrick Wilson II began his professional career with Chicago Sockers when he joined the team for a European tour in March 2008. During the tour, the Sockers competed against FC Utrecht, Vitesse, Cambuur, Heracles, FC Omniworld, FC Emmen. While on tour, Wilson was offered a trial with FC Omniworld, which participates in the Eerste Division, Dutch second tier division.
After participating in six matches with the Chicago Sockers, Wilson joined Royal Racing FC Montegnee of Belgium's Provincial League from August till December 2008. Wilson appeared in 14 games with Royal Racing FC. In December, Patrick signed for his current team, Integral DAC Gyor SE of the Hungarian NBII. Patrick currently has made 15 appearances for the Hungarian side.
College career
As a freshmen at the College of the Southwest, Wilson started in all 16 matches and scored 2 goals. After his freshmen year, Patrick transferred to Cornerstone University where he participated in 46 matches over his remaining three years in college. Moreover, Wilson was two-time NAIA All-American, Newcomer of the year, three-time First Team All Conference, and two-time First Team All Region.
Kenniel Martin (b. 1984 March 17, Kingston, Jamaica) is a Jamaican soccer player currently playing for Lapuan Virkiä in Finland's Kakkonen.
Professional career
In 2007, Kenniel Martin played for the Chicago Fire, where he participated in five matches for the club's senior and reserve squad. Following his stint with the Fire, Martin played in two matches the New York Red Bulls. Thereafter, Martin trailed with FCM Bacau in Romania before playing with Hartford United, which competes in the Connecticut Soccer League in 2008.
In 2009, Kenniel had a successful trial with Lapuan Virkiä and subsequently signed with the club. Since joining Lapuan Virkiä, Martin has tallied one goal and four assists over ten matches. Lapuan Virkiä currently competes in Finland's third tier Kakkonen league.
College career
Martin played for four seasons at University of Hartford. During his freshmen year he was selected for the America East All-Conference Second Team and the All-Rookie Team. During his senior year he was named to the All-Tournament team at the Hartwick Tournament.
Professional career
In 2007, Kenniel Martin played for the Chicago Fire, where he participated in five matches for the club's senior and reserve squad. Following his stint with the Fire, Martin played in two matches the New York Red Bulls. Thereafter, Martin trailed with FCM Bacau in Romania before playing with Hartford United, which competes in the Connecticut Soccer League in 2008.
In 2009, Kenniel had a successful trial with Lapuan Virkiä and subsequently signed with the club. Since joining Lapuan Virkiä, Martin has tallied one goal and four assists over ten matches. Lapuan Virkiä currently competes in Finland's third tier Kakkonen league.
College career
Martin played for four seasons at University of Hartford. During his freshmen year he was selected for the America East All-Conference Second Team and the All-Rookie Team. During his senior year he was named to the All-Tournament team at the Hartwick Tournament.
Kiwis Against Seabed Mining (KASM) is an environmental group established to warn of alleged environmental risks associated with the mining of the sea bed around New Zealand.
In March 2005 an application was lodged by Australian company BQL for a minerals permit for exploration prior to mining black sands off the West Coast of the North Island. This was the determining factor for the formation of KASM. KASM was originally Raglan based but now has membership and organisational groups in Piha, Raglan and Taranaki with support from many other environmental groups.
February 2007 saw Rio Tinto (one of the world's largest mining companies) acquire the majority share of the West Coast North Island placed seabed prospecting permit previously held by Iron ore NZ Ltd.
In March 2005 an application was lodged by Australian company BQL for a minerals permit for exploration prior to mining black sands off the West Coast of the North Island. This was the determining factor for the formation of KASM. KASM was originally Raglan based but now has membership and organisational groups in Piha, Raglan and Taranaki with support from many other environmental groups.
February 2007 saw Rio Tinto (one of the world's largest mining companies) acquire the majority share of the West Coast North Island placed seabed prospecting permit previously held by Iron ore NZ Ltd.