Talk:Stabilizing ferroelectric materials

This is a massive amount of storage Anything could be possible!!! Even solving chess which has 10^50 possible moves. How many cubic liters of water would that take to store all that data?--Anthonynow12 17:12, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Is there a paper on this?

The article is derived from a single press release, and the description of the technology is so superficial that the article's first paragraph doesn't make much sense. Is there a real technical paper on this new approach to ferroelectric RAM?

The claims are also over-hyped. There's nothing in this technology that makes it easier to fabricate 3D memory devices, as opposed to flat chips like we have today. Yet the storage densities are hyped as if this is a 3D memory device. I've toned the article down a bit, but it really needs information from a source other than the press release. --John Nagle 17:12, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

I think this article should be removed, maybe consider moving parts of it to ferroelectric RAM. Bigly (talk) 14:55, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Water problems
Just a theoretical question. Would things like evaporation and/or leakage lead to loss of files and/or certain memory? Seeing that this is a "low activity" article and talk page, please message me if you have a response. Socby19 05:54, 12 April 2007 (UTC)Socby19

Eh, I don't think the article is literally referring to the usage of water for data storage. 4.243.164.182 12:50, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Main Menu

See Also

Main Menu