|
Superrelativity
Superrelativity is per definition an improvement of Einstein's General Relativity. From Latin, super stands for 'better' and relativity stands for the latest widely accepted "General Relativity". This is analog to superstring and supergravity notations. There have been many authors and articles attempting a definition of this superrelativity.
There are currently two fields of thought on the subject. One of the more published authors, Peter Leiffer has proposed a Superrelativity theory. Mark Fiorentino has proposed a theory of Super Relativity.
Superrrelativity Theory
Peter Leiffer has proposed a superrelativity theory as an element of a Final Theory
----
Super Relativity Theory Most recent theoretical breakthroughs
However, this was first aligned to comply with a Theory of Everything by computer scientist and philosopher Mark Fiorentino as recently as 2006. He was a longtime software engineer, and an awarded trouble-shooter at IBM. He has also been a philosopher for more than 20 years. Where in other unsuccessful theories, a fifth dimension of curved space was envisioned, he stated that a dimension of twisted, inverted space does in fact exist. This "Super Relativity" theory also complies in it's simplicity to Occam's Razor.
Mechanistic Model Based on a Solid, Electromechanistic Dimension Super Relativity, based on General Relativity and Special Relativity, brings the good ideas of the past together with those of the present and creates a new 5th dimension based theoretical concept. The result of which becomes a physical reality model that employs common sense mechanics to explain the laws of physical reality. It does not contradict Special or General Relativity. It does however, extendnboth theories by using a physical model that supports field theory as the most sensible explanation for force, (action at a distance).
Dimensions
Super Relativity states that there are 5 dimensions. Three for each direction of spatial deformation (X,Y,Z), 1 for time and one dimension of proposed twisted, inverted space. This last dimension accounts for all natural forces, except gravity.
Gravity
Super Relativity’s explanation for the source of gravitational fields is both simple and elegant. Using SR Theory’s physical model we now should be able to predict particle mass. The ability to predict the mass of particles has long been a problem with the Standard Model. Super Relativity says that quarks and other similar sub-atomic particles generate gravitational attraction by virtue of their motion and is a function of charge, orbital velocity, orbital circumference and shape. Using already established Lorentzian formulas masses are predictable. The SR Theory of Mass and Inertia is consistent with both Special and General Relativity using their formulas and postulates to form the mechanical method that provides an explanation for the central cause of the gravitational field. The source of Gravitation fields and inertial responses are caused by electromagnetic particles in motion.
Particle Theory
The Photon
The photon’s internal core is a collapsed region of space. It may be collapsed to such an extent that it may even qualify as an ultraminiature “black hole." This is what gives the photon its mass. The SR Theory can and will answer how a particle can appear not to have mass but still possess mass. The photon’s gravitational core is surrounded by an overshield. This outer layer is where space has been twisted, which creates the particle’s electrostatic component. Spatial inversion completely envelops the gravitational component of the photon. Because of this configuration, the gravitational component is for the most part isolated from the external environment and prevented from reacting too strongly, gravitationally speaking, with other matter. The spatial twist (or overshield) stretches space, lessening the effect that gravity has on space.
Current Status
There is currently a great deal of resources being attributed to the concept, but there is still some work to be done. In particular on finalizing the mathematical analysis and in the experimental field. Although most, if not all, preliminary results do look very promising.
|
|
|