Philosophical games

Philosophical games are games designed to invite players to think philosophically within (and about) their gameworlds.
Fictional content has historically been an important component of how philosophical knowledge has been developed and communicated. Its use is particularly noteworthy in thought experiments and fictional cases (i.e. verisimilar scenarios used to exemplify or to disprove a certain hypothesis; see Johan De Smedt & Helen De Cruz & Alex Fisher). Like non-interactive forms of speculative fiction, according to the philosopher and game scholar Stefano Gualeni, philosophical games present fictional contents and prescribe various acts of imagination. Three interrelated traits, however, are characteristic of interactive fiction in particular, and set the experiential worlds of games and digital games apart from other ways to access fictional contents. The manipulability and responsiveness of gameworlds afford players the possibility to take meaningful decisions and actions within those worlds. The fact that player decisions and actions can be recognized as having a philosophical relevance depends on the context in which they are taken, and on what kind of outcomes the designers of a game planned for them. Due to the replayability of games, a player is able to assess (and potentially revise) one's decisions and actions in light of having empirical knowledge of their outcomes.
# A high degree of fictional completeness: Digital games typically offer a richer representation of fictional objects, characters, and events than non-interactive forms of fiction do. In films and novels, the incomplete description of fictional world can be embraced as an appeal to the appreciator's creativity and an opportunity for them to freely imagine what is not overtly represented in the work. In digital games, however, aesthetic incompleteness is often experienced as a deficiency and a limitation to players' freedom to explore and look at every nook and cranny of the gameworld
Rhetorical games and dialectical games
Philosophical games grant interactive and experiential access to speculative scenarios that invite players to engage with philosophical questions and themes. In relation to those questions and themes, some playful philosophical scenarios are designed to convince players of the soundness of certain observations and courses of action. Other philosophical games are, instead, more ambiguous and exploratory, putting the onus of determining the best course of action and the meaning of in-game decisions (or lack thereof) onto players themselves. Stefano Gualeni labels this second kind of relationship between a philosophical game and its players as mainly "dialectical.".
In terms of the rhetorical use of games, one could - for instance - examine titles that emphasize the hopelessness and unfairness of certain sociopolitical arrangements. Players of these kinds of dystopian games are often not provided with sufficient resources or enough chances to bring about positive changes in the gameworld that they (fictionally) inhabit. There is an evident rhetorical goal in putting players in conditions where change is impossible and a tragic conclusion is inevitable. Examples of these playable, dystopian reflections on social oppression can be identified in Every Day the Same Dream (Molleindustria, 2009) or Cart Life (Hofmeier, 2010), in which players' interactions cannot prevent frustration and loss. In their arguing in favor of a certain point or perspective, rhetorical games tend to either converge towards a single conclusion, like in the cases that were just discussed, or various possible end-states. When multiple end-state are possible, games that take a rhetorical approach to philosophical themes present an obvious hierarchy with regard to their finales.
Another distinction that proves useful in understanding philosophical games concerns their focus. Some digital games, like the already mentioned Detroit: Become Human, are big productions: they are games that last for several hours and elaborate upon multiple themes and tropes from a variety of disciplines (philosophy, literature, law and so on). There are philosophical games that, instead, focus on one theme, or sometimes even on just a single question. When these smaller, usually experimental productions take a predominantly rhetorical approach to their theme (like Jesper Juul's 2021 The Game of Video Game Objects), they can be labelled "playable essays.". What makes those situations problematic to act upon usually depends on their ambiguity and on the emotional investment of the players. Some of the ethical dilemmas presented in these games echo (or even directly reference) philosophical perspectives on matters such as moral responsibility. It might help, here, to think of thought experiments like the trolley problem and about how often interactive fictions disclose similar scenarios to their players. A player who is challenged to think through knotty ethical situations and is asked to act upon them, and is finally faced with their consequences in a fictional context, undergoes experiences that have the potential to be educational and even transformative. Similar to non-interactive fictions, it can be argued that sufficiently engaging and verisimilar philosophical games can help us cultivate and obtain a firmer grasp of theories in moral philosophy, refine our sensitivity and help us better orient our moral compass. Games like Brenda Romero's 2009 Holocaust-inspired board game Train, Lucas Pope's 2013 bureaucratic dystopian video game Papers, Please or Molleindustria's 2016 gentrification simulation Nova Alea are widely considered to be successful examples of this use of games.
The political issues addressed by philosophical games are, however, not limited to interactively identifying the inadequacies or the utopian possibilities of society-wide systems. Some games with critical intents directed toward society and politics concentrate their attention on the oppressing effects those customs and institutions have at the scale of the individual human being. This kind of philosophical games focuses on the personal and often mundane cases of economic marginalization, racial discrimination and gender identity.
Alterity and estrangement
Digital games can also have philosophical uses that emerge from their ability to disclose extraordinary experiences for their players. Miegakure, for example, is a forthcoming, experimental puzzle-platformer video game designed to challenge players to actively solve puzzles in four spatial dimensions. Its gameplay is similar to that of a regular three-dimensional platformer game.
Miegakure invites the players to take a philosophical perspective on gameworlds as new experiential and epistemic domains. Similar aspirations can be recognized in titles such as Valve Corporation's 2007 puzzle-platformer video game Portal or the experimental first-person game prototype A Slower Speed of Light (MIT Lab, 2012). Where Portal challenges players to experiment with the idea that space can be interactively made discontinuous (i.e. tunneled through while preserving inertia of motion), A Slower Speed of Light allows them to playfully familiarize with the experience of being affected by special relativity (i.e. what it is like to perceive and interact the gameworld when moving at a speed that approaches that of light).
Our understanding of games
Philosophical games often take games themselves as their object of interest. In other words, there are games that invite what is technically called a meta-reflexive (or self-reflexive) perspective. Those games are deliberately designed to materialize, through their gameplay and their aesthetic qualities, critical and/or satirical perspectives on the ways in which games themselves are designed, played, sold, manipulated, experienced and understood as social objects.
Meta-reflexive games often disclose experiences that are not inherently enjoyable or rewarding: many philosophical games of this kind are short-lived, unwinnable and purposefully annoying, Necessary Evil, the already mentioned The Stanley Parable, or The Beginner's Guide (Everything Unlimited Ltd., 2015).
It is important to insist on the fact that these games are not whimsically taking a metafictional stance, and do not embrace weirdness and unconventionality as ends in themselves - on the contrary, those games do so with an evident critical intent (or an obviously satirical perspective) on how games are currently made, marketed, played and culturally valued<ref name=":5" />. In the cases of the games mentioned above, Necessary Evil playfully reveals the idealistic player-centrism that underpins the creation of every gameworld, The Stanley Parable is a video game that constantly breaks the to engage players in reflecting on the significance (if any) of in-game agency, and The Beginner's Guide is a playable essay on the very practice of game development and on players' practices of meaning-making.

Main Menu

See Also

Main Menu