|
The Final World Order is a term coined by the General Federalist Society to refer to any plan, design or ideology which espouses an alternative to the political New World Order to which the world is currently evolving. It promotes the idea that most of these trends are neo-liberal ideas that undermine human liberty, subjugate third world and non-western nations and are spearheaded by the IMF and World Bank. It contends that the values of these international banks, and to a lesser degree, the values of the ICC, the UN, and other global bodies are at fundamental odds with those of the vast majority of the world's population. General Federalists, as the creator's of the term "Final World Order" in this usage, aver that a more just, representative system durable and steeped with mechanisms to control the accretion of power globally is needed as a substitute for the new political world order presently evolving and strengthening. It views this as a pragmatic step necessary to usurp the global sovereignty of any contrarian global government it sees as inevitably abusing an unlimited accretion of global power given sufficient time. Under this umbrella, a "Final World Order" is any solution, whether that espoused by the General Federalist Society or not, that seeks to solve this purported dilemma of the new political world order - or any moniker thereof - by substituting its own solution instead. It does not officially hold that the current trends in world governance are the result of a conspiracy and eschews this view. In its canonical form, General Federalism is an anti-nationalistic, language fair, culturally neutral, spiritually unassociated, pluralistic and apolitical form of ideology. This apparent contradiction in terms between "apolitical" and "ideology" is too lengthy to summarize here. The General Federalist Society, or GFS, sees this discussion of a durable, representative and just world government as the most intellectually challenging, important and monumental discussion in the history of human civilization. For these reasons, its relevance to the well known and oft-discussed issues regarding the United Nations, global governance, and the new world political order generally makes it a noteworthy footnote for public dissemination and possible discussion.
|
|
|