Remote Neural Monitoring (RNM) is a purported form of functional neuroimaging that is capable of extracting EEG data from the human brain at a distance with no contacts or electrodes required. It is claimed to have been developed by the NSA. It is further claimed that the NSA has the capablility to decode this data to extract subvocalizations, visual and auditory data. In effect it allows access to a person's thoughts without their knowledge or permission. It has been alleged that various organizations have been using Remote Neural Monitoring on US and other citizens for surveillance and harassment purposes.
History Remote Neural Monitoring has its roots in the MK-ULTRA project of the 1950s which, although it focussed on drugs for mind control, also included neurological research into "radiation" (non-ionizing EMF) and bioelectric research and development. The earliest non-classified references to this type of technology appear in a 1976 patent by R.G. Malech “Apparatus and method for remotely monitoring and altering brain waves” USPTO granted 4/20/76. The patent describes a technique using the transmission of 100 and 210 MHz signals to the brain yielding a 110 MHz signal which is modulated by the brain waves and can be detected by a receiver for further processing.
In the early 1980s it is claimed that the NSA began extensive use of Remote Neural Monitoring. Much of what is known about it stems from evidence presented as part of a 1992 court case brought by former NSA employee John St.Claire Akwei against the NSA. It describes an extensive array of advanced technology and resources dedicated to remotely monitoring hundreds of thousands of people in the US and abroad. Capabilities include access to an individual's subvocalizations as well as images from the visual cortex and sounds from the auditory cortex.
Peaceful applications While the existence of and use of this technology by organizations like the NSA is difficult to validate, recent advances in non-classified areas are demonstrating what is possible: * Subvocal recognition using attached electrodes has already been achieved by NASA. * BCIs for gaming consoles from companies like NeuroSky perform primitive "thought reading" in that they can be controlled with a helmet on the player's head, where the player can execute a few commands just by thinking about them. * Ambient has demonstrated a motorized wheelchair that is controlled by thought.
I have been plagued by remote neural monitoring for many years now and I am trying to figure out what avenues to take in order to make it stop. During the course of 3 years I have accrued a number of invoices and text messages from people who have been involved and I am working on doing a report that I will be sending to many media outlets. I have emailed the NSA, FBI,and CIA in regards to this matter but I'm not sure what else I can do. I am looking for others who have been plagued by this as well. I feel that if we unite we can have our voices heard. Please email me if you feel the same way and maybe we can begin to try and bring about some resolution to all of this.
Guest
2. 15-07-2010 04:33
this is a reality today. read the interview with former NSA employeee, Russell Tice. This is the technology he is talking about in that interview that should not be disclosed to the public for 200 years. The only problem is it is being misused to ruin lives now.
Guest
3. 15-07-2010 04:38
that interview with Russell Tice is in Reason Magazine 2006. Link below
Russell Tice- Former NSA Officer interview, Reason Magazine 2006
REASON: How scrupulous is the general culture of the NSA about avoiding spying on Americans?
Tice: As a signals intelligence officer, kids who go right out of college and work for the NSA, this is drilled into you, especially when you're young: You will not do this. This is number one of the NSA's Ten Commandments: You will not spy on Americans. Even after you've had all those introductory briefings when you're a new employee, for the rest of your career, at least twice a year they call you in for a briefing, and this is always covered. "You will not do this," they shake their fingers at you. "If you do this you can be thrown in jail." And all of a sudden you find out the people who've been shaking their fingers are doing what they're telling you is against the law and coming out with some cockeyed nonsense excuses for why everything's OK. It's sort of like having your parents drill it into you not to smoke cigarettes or do drugs or whatever, and then after you're a good little boy coming home from school at 15 and finding your parents out on the balcony doing all that.
Fear rules the day right now. For the most part, people know, NSA employees know, that this is wrong, that this is illegal. In many cases they feel betrayed by their own leadership, by [former NSA Director Gen. Michael] Hayden, [NSA Director Lt. Gen. Keith] Alexander, and by [Deputy Director] Bill Black.
Guest
5. 15-07-2010 04:47
REASON: Are you at all sympathetic to claims that the New York Times' reporting on NSA surveillance may have harmed national security?
Tice:" In my case, there's no way the programs I want to talk to Congress about should be public ever, unless maybe in 200 years they want to declassify them. You should never learn about it; no one at the Times should ever learn about these things. But that same mechanism that allows you to have a program like this at an extremely high, sensitive classification level could also be used to mask illegality, like spying on Americans. And spying on Americans is illegal unless you go to a FISA court. It's the job of the FBI to conduct operations against Americans with the proper court warrants—not that I have a very high opinion of the FBI."
they shouldn't come out to the public for 200 years because it is Remote Neural Monitoring and the bastards are using on innocent American Citizens today.
