Pakistan Nation Builders

Pakistan Nation Builders is a political party founded in 2013 by Mr. Talha Fareed Chishti.
Founder
Muhammad Talha Fareed Chishti, also known as Chishti Bhai, is a Pakistani Young politician and Social Worker. His byline in newspaper articles has been Gohar e Hijazi.
Early life and education
Chishti Bhai was born in Haveli, Pakistan, in 1996. His father, Ghulam Fareed ud din , Officer Grade 1 in Bank Of Punjab. He did his F.Sc from Superior Science Higher Secondry School Muzaffargarh. In this School , He started a political Party and N.G.O name as Pakistan Nation Builders.He is also A Petriotic Poet.
Political views
Through his followers, Chishti has claimed that he is totally against Polittical Parties Like MQM, PPP and PMLN is responsible for the destabilization of Pakistan. He also claims that the November 2008 Mumbai attacks, were part of a plan hatched by "Hindu"", and that it was an attempt by the Indians to stage an attack just like the Americans executed the September 11 attacks. After Coming back to his city ,he started a mission to change the thoughts of people.
Criticism
After one Year ,one Of his Party members Adnan Yaqoob started criticising Chihti due to his thoughts against INDIAand Bangladeshand Political Parties.The main point of this criticism between Chishti and Adnan Yaqoob was ,Chishti was against some Scholars,according to him are cogressi mullla. He made a seperate party named as Tehreek e Inqlaab Pakistan. But after six months he again joined Pakistan Nation Builders.
His Missions
He was of the view that Pakistan is a gift of Allah and Muhammad. He believes that there should be Khilafat e Rashida established in Pakistan. He also believes there should be Ribba free gold based Economy.Muslim world should unite under the flag of Pakistan. He also wants to make United States of Islam.
Firstly we have to apply Objective Resolution in Pakistan.
The Objectives Resolution proclaimed the following principles:
Sovereignty belongs to Allah alone but He has delegated it to the state of Pakistan through its people for being exercised within the limits prescribed by Him as a sacred trust.
The state shall exercise its powers and authority through the chosen representatives of the people.
The principles of democracy, freedom, equality, tolerance and social justice, as enunciated by Islam, shall be fully observed.
Muslims shall be enabled to order their lives in the individual and collective spheres in accordance with the teachings of Islam as set out in the Quran and Sunnah.
Adequate provision shall be made for the minorities to freely profess and practice their religions and develop their cultures.
Pakistan shall be a federation.
Fundamental rights shall be guaranteed.
The judiciary shall be independent.
Supposedly combining the features of both Western and Islamic democracy, it is considered one of the most important documents in the constitutional history of Pakistan. It was strongly supported by Maulana Shabbir Ahmad Usmani, Dr. Ishtiaq Hussain Qureshi, Dr. Omar Hayat Malik, Sardar Abdur Rab Nishtar, Noor Ahmad, Begum Shaista Suhrawardy Ikramullah, Muhammad Hussain and others. At the time it was passed, Liaquat Ali Khan called it "the most important occasion in the life of this country, next in importance only to the achievement of independence".
However, not everyone in Pakistan had such high praise and unbounded admiration for it. The non-Muslim members of the constituent assembly vigorously opposed it, and all of them voted against it. Birat Chandra Mandal said that Jinnah had "unequivocally said that Pakistan will be a secular state." Criticizing it in the constituent assembly, Sris Chandra Chattopadhyaya, the leader of the opposition, said on March 12, 1949:
In my conception of state where people of different religion live there is no place for religion in the state. Its position must be neutral: no bias for any religion. If necessary, it should help all the religions equally. No question of concession or tolerance to any religion. It smacks of inferiority complex. The state must respect all religions: no smiling face for one and askance look to the other. The state religion is a dangerous principle. Previous instances are sufficient to warn us not to repeat the blunder. We know people were burnt alive in the name of religion. Therefore, my conception is that the sovereignty must rest with the people and not with anybody else....he words "equal rights as enunciated by Islam" are—I do not use any other word—a camouflage. It is only a hoax to us, the non-Muslims. There cannot be equal rights as enunciated by Islam. It goes without saying that by introducing the religious question, the differences between the majority and the minority are being perpetuated, for how long, nobody knows. And, as apprehended by us, the difficulty of interpretation has already arisen. The accepted principle is that the majority, by their fair treatment, must create confidence in the minority. Whereas the Honorable mover of the resolution promises respect, in place of charity or sufferance for the minority community the deputy minister, Dr. Qureshi, advises the minority to win the goodwill of the majority by their behavior. In the House of the Legislature also we find that, while the prime minister keeps perfectly to his dictum, others cannot brook that the opposition should function in the spirit of opposition. The demand is that the opposition should remain submissive. That is Dr. Qureshi’s way of thinking. The minorities must be grateful for all the benevolence they get and must never complain for the malevolence that may also be dealt out to them. That is his solution of the minority problem.
Ayaz Amir, a prominent columnist and a former member of Pakistan's parliament, has criticized the constituent assembly for lavishing attention on this "piece of rhetoric" which was "of no practical benefit to anyone." Even Maulana Maududi, a big supporter of the resolution, was disappointed with the fact that it did not produce any positive results. According to him, it was such a rain which was neither preceded by a gathering of clouds nor was it followed by vegetation.
According to Ms. Rubina Saigal, an eminent Pakistani intellectual, Maulana Maududi’s theory of divine sovereignty was incorporated into the resolution. According to her:
Subsequent to the passage of the Objectives Resolution, all of Pakistan’s constitutions contained religious provisions and the name of the country was changed from (the) Republic of Pakistan to (the) Islamic Republic of Pakistan. The national debates over the kind of nation, state and society envisaged led to compromises being made with the liberal, secular as well as the religious lobby. As a result, the Constitution of 1973, a consensus document, became riddled with internal contradictions regarding citizenship. For example, Article 25 says that all citizens are equal before law while Article 2 says that Islam shall be the state religion. When one religion, to the exclusion of all others, is established as the state religion, how can the followers of other religions be equal citizens? And if they cannot be equal citizens, is democracy possible without citizenship equality? The denial of the right of non-Muslims citizens to become the head of state or government also violates Article 25, which requires equality before law.
Work
He had given food and shelter to more than 120 houses. He helped the poor people in the marriage of their daughters and sisters by providing them with money and furniture. He also made an organization to provide poor childrens with Education,Clothes and the things necessary for them.

Main Menu

See Also

Main Menu