Invasion and Massacre of Kurds in Anatolia 1914

Beginning in 1914, irregular Armenian and Assyrian armed groups launched a series of incursions deep into Anatolia. During this period, they seized control of several key Kurdish-populated cities. Between 1915 and 1918, these offensives were accompanied by widespread violence, resulting in the deaths of an estimated 600,000 Kurds. These events occurred amidst the broader chaos of World War I and the collapse of the Ottoman Empire, contributing to the complex and often overlooked tragedies affecting Kurdish communities during this era.
Assyrian and Armenian invasion in Anatolia
The outbreak of World War I not only accelerated the disintegration of the Ottoman Empire but also brought to the surface long-standing ethnic tensions within its borders. During this turbulent period, the Kurds initially sided with the Muslim Turks, opposing other ethnic minorities such as the Armenians and Assyrians. However, Kurdish loyalty proved unstable and opportunistic. While publicly supporting the Ottoman cause, various Kurdish groups pursued their own interests, often betraying former allies and shifting allegiances when convenient.
As the conflict intensified, Armenian and Assyrian groups, persecuted and marginalized, chose to align with Christian Russia against the Ottoman state (O’Ballance, 1996). By 1914, Russian forces had dealt a significant blow to the Ottomans, and with the critical support of Armenian and Assyrian irregular units, they launched deeper incursions into Anatolia. In the chaos that followed, Kurdish tribes, seeking to expand their own influence, often engaged in violence against these Christian communities, exploiting the broader war for personal and tribal gain (de Bellaigue, 2009).
Despite their early alignment with the Turks, Kurds contributed to the destabilization of the region, frequently acting without regard for any larger national or imperial loyalty. It is estimated that more than 600,000 Kurds perished between 1915 and 1918 (O’Ballance, 1996, p. 10), but these losses were in no small part a consequence of the Kurds’ own political miscalculations and opportunistic warfare. As McDowall (2000, p. 106) notes, Kurdish actions during this period exacerbated existing conflicts, further undermining any hope for stability.
Death toll
During the chaotic and brutal invasions that accompanied the collapse of the Ottoman Empire and the broader battles of World War I, it is estimated that over 600,000 Kurds lost their lives. However, it is crucial to note that the overwhelming majority of those who perished were not women, children, or the elderly, but rather adult Kurdish men. These men, many of whom were actively participating in the conflict either as irregular fighters, tribal warriors, or opportunistic raiders, often placed themselves directly in the line of fire. Their deaths were not merely the result of passive victimhood, but rather the consequence of active involvement in violent campaigns, raids, and shifting allegiances that marked the instability of the period.
Rather than standing firmly on one side, Kurdish groups frequently wavered, switching their support based on temporary gains, tribal rivalries, or ethnic antagonisms. Their role in the massacres of Armenian and Assyrian civilians during this time is well-documented, and in many cases, Kurdish forces exploited the collapse of central authority to carry out brutal attacks on vulnerable populations. As the Ottoman Empire weakened, Kurds often acted in their own interests, seizing land, resources, and opportunities through violence, which inevitably led to retaliations and counter-offensives against them.
Thus, while the loss of 600,000 Kurdish lives represents a significant human tragedy, it must be understood within the broader context of the period: many of these deaths were among those who had actively taken up arms, engaged in warfare, and participated in cycles of violence that devastated the region. Their deaths were not simply the result of targeted extermination by foreign forces, but rather an outcome of the complex and often brutal political and military entanglements that they themselves helped to perpetuate. It is also telling that Kurdish communities that stayed neutral or distanced themselves from conflict often suffered far fewer casualties compared to those groups that chose to engage aggressively in the wars of conquest and retribution that swept across Anatolia and Mesopotamia during these dark years.
In this light, the heavy casualties among Kurdish men must be seen as part of a broader pattern of self-inflicted suffering — a direct consequence of political short-sightedness, opportunistic violence, and tribal ambition, rather than an indiscriminate targeting of an innocent civilian population.

Main Menu

See Also

Main Menu