General Theory about Compensations

With regard to the General Theory of Compensations: I would like to show you an advising to some possible partial readings as a result of this theory, You are going to find in this General Theory of Compensations so many meeting points in common with other theories. That is because since being a universal law, and consequently so general both in its applied field and in some factors of the theory itself, it agglutinates them in aspects and tendencies that are in point of fact. With those particularities at those meeting points, the theory, indeed, offer and deny his agreement with many other existent theories, in the same way to those which could appear onwards.

Examples: mechanistic laws: Newton`s Law, Copernico`s Law, Darwin`s Law (regarding to evolution, General Theory of Compensations differs and agglutinates satisfaction and compensation related to evolution), Epicureanism (regarding to the tendency on the way to satisfaction, in spite of its limitations), Freud, (although in this case, satisfaction do not implied compensation, he just reviewed and generalized it essentially regarding to sex…), Scales of Values, Motivations (regarding to motivation, it approximates more to the full idea of compensation, but not to the concept of motivation, which is more restrictive. Even it is restrictive when things are idealised and they are carried to the field of ideas, being in a different view from motivations. Afterwards, they are carried to the field of understanding and to a more complex field yet. This field is the one that settle the man beyond partial factors of motivations. (Sense of duty, altruism, several religious ideas and beliefs…)

And all of them (theories, thoughts, several ideas), seen from a given point of view can seem or can be the General Theory of Compensations. The reason of this is affirmation is that all these aspects dealt before agree with The General Theory of Compensations, but also because they are truths, and finally because they are present in the Theory of Compensations. In the full-sense of the word, this Theory, being universal, globalizes everything, in all its true features, being related these true features each other within it and extending them. This General Theory reach further views, even it reach ideas and beliefs such as religious ones. It views these ideas and beliefs even within the human conception schemes, but also this General Theory of Compensations restricts those features which do not offer credibility. To sum up we can say that it pictures a whole map for the comprehension of “everything” mechanism.

Therefore, this theory implies a kind of revolution. It implies an evolution in thought, a new general Thought system. It implies to forget several concepts and assume other ones. It is, without doubt the Theory of the future, the Theory for the coming 21th Century Generations and further ones forever. Hence, It is a theory that must be recognised by thought being otherwise unfair, because here is the Theory, the new Theory of Thought.

GENERAL THEORY ABOUT COMPENSATIONS: UNIVERSAL COMPENSTIONS LAW.

The key universal principle, the ruler of everything, what makes that everything tends to be compensated by means of satisfaction in everyone of its level.

The universe and organic material tends to satisfy its own laws, tendencies, and conditions which rules his mechanisms (stars, beings, galaxies, and the relationships existing among them). But it also rules, the animate world by means of the satisfaction of laws, organization levels conditions, heritance, instincts, needs…

Human beings, as well as satisfying everything said before, by being involved and taking part in it (tendencies, conditions, needs, instincts in a further level), tends to compensate himself by means of whatever from his own level: feelings, hobbies, desires, interests, folk, ideas… Humans makes, more or less consciously, that more compensates him, or that he thinks is going to compensate him, instead being physical or psychical depending on his conditions, instincts, needs, costumes, education, environment, circumstances, behaviour, feelings, tastes, desires, knowledge, convictions, beliefs, expectations, ideas, compensations, and combinations, influences, and inner relationships, that at the same time are given until searching the further compensative state which is happiness.

At the same time, every upper and lower scheme developed will tend to satisfy, more or less, that from his lower levels, at from his own.

Example: the associations among the previous features groups, colonies, societies, the possibilities of other organisms, beings, upper and lower organizations… This is the whole Universe.

Norm: UNIVERSAL COMPENSATIONS LAW (human level).
UNIVERSAL NORMS FOR HUMNAN BEHAVIOUR.

1- Human being (everybody) always do whatever is going to compensate him more, or whatever he thinks that is going to compensate him more (or is going to be less prejudicial for him). This fact will depend on the conditions which influence him: genetics, education, experiences, circumstances, thoughts, It also depends on the power of factors and convergence among them (value scales).

2- A partial behaviour which apparently do not give satisfaction as a result, or even drives to dissatisfaction, always has to do with a compensation (or a higher satisfaction. So, human being gives up certain satisfaction in favour to any compensation or higher satisfaction.

3- Satisfaction can be both physical and psychological and even can be related, can influence, complement, and argue each other.

4- Compensation can come from outwards or on the contrary can be in the inner of the individual (can obtain something in change: inner or outer reward).

5- Whatever a particular individual compensates can differ in time and circumstances (owing to changing factors) or on the contrary can persist.

Explanative colloquial extract about “General Theory ABOUT Compensations”:

THE WORLD OF COMPENSATIONS:

- Everybody always do whatever more compensates him or he thinks is going to compensate him more.

That is not in really true because, for example, there are other powerful forces that obey other laws. They drive us to do enough we are able to but not what we want or compensate us. The same happens in other different cases. For example: the survival instinct implies that in spite of difficult circumstances we always are able to go on with strength.

Of course it is true that there are forces that do not let us to do whatever we want and whatever we expect, it is true, but nevertheless, we try to be successful within our possibilities. For this reason we are dealing with an intention, more or less conscious or unconscious (and so many times we have no possibilities to reach it and thus to satisfy our instincts, our preferences, desires, education, ideas, beliefs, thoughts, expectations…).

But the key question is that we tend by force to that, we use to behave ourselves in that way. We tend to follow that what is going to compensate us, what is going to satisfy us until achieving the higher possible compensation: happiness, the deepest compensation. Every individual in the world has a different concept of happiness but everybody tend to follow happiness.

With regard to the survival instinct, when someone fights it is because he or she does not want to pass away. Wishes are always present, so if one is not let to die or on the contrary he/she does, that is because it compensates to him. For this reason we can say that the survival instinct has not logical, everything depends on if fighting compensates him/her or do not. For this reason we must forget the concept “instinct of survival” because survival drives us to compensations.

But that is because the individual is upset. If you give up for a time, or you get the individual do not suicide himself at the moment, the individual will not want to carry out the fact of suicide later on. Consequently, if it changes what a person perform, even if one day he/she performs in a way and the following day he/she performs the opposite, if always performs in the more compensative way it would not change.

What compensate a person indeed can be different depending on the moment and the existing circumstances owing to factors. This fact implies a change in the parameters and subsequently a change in the behaviour of the individual.

So that, indeed, everybody always behave in the more compensative way for himself, because that is what more compensate us at the moment surrounded by the particular factors of that moment. The changing of the moment implies a change in the parameters too. As a result of this, the compensative thing can be different than the previous one, it can be the same one, or even it can be just the opposite one.

-But, what about love and unpolluted friendship?

- What is love? When you stare a couple, what are you really staring?

Do you pay attention at first to her/his…. or perhaps to her/his… or how does he(she is and behaves in general terms? Sometimes you realise his/her manners and other times you become familiar with any particular detail about your couple.. Even you can fall in love by means of your loved psychical qualities, even sexuality can be important.

-But love is much more than this.

-Yes, it can be all that and much more that all said before. It can means sensations, reactions, and it can means a little part or the whole part raised to the main power. But that is so! On the contrary, instead a man or a woman who satisfies your sexual preferences you would choice to live with any friend, your own family, or even a pet. Bear in mind that you are choosing according to your own tastes, your own ideas, and your own costumes. But you don´t have to worry because that is life itself, it is neither good nor bad but the deepest meaning of everyone´s particularity.

-And what about friendship? Here nothing has to do sex, neither you choose the person on physical basis nor on psychical ones. Friendship is pure.

If you realize, in spite of the absence of all said before, when you choose a friend, you become conscious or you do not about that selection, because that friendship satisfies you, being together with a friend provides you satisfaction, his/her personality, behaviour. You avoid loneliness and materialism. The normal thing is not to choose a person who do not likes you unless that person satisfies you or provides you with pleasure in any particular way. Depending on the sense of your own conception about friendship, and the greeting delight this friendship provides you, it will make you feel good offering more than received, receiving more than what you offer, becoming frustrated or unsatisfied because you are not compensated according to what you expect… Satisfaction can be both physical and psychical (if you fulfil your expectations. It can be satisfaction about well-done things, or about the expectance on the parameters within you have been brought up, or about the achievement of your aims and ambitions, or about both together because they can influence, complement, or be against each other. There is the possibility aims come outwards too from the rest of people, or from environment) via integration, reconnaissance, awards, greetings… This can be carried out by means of the individual towards himself (self-compensation), experienced by well-being sensations. These kinds of experiences are induced by reasons explained before. That is similar to a psychological masturbation carried out by well-being psychical sensations become in physical ones, or vice-versa. At the same time thy can be produced by the segregation of chemical substances, emotions, personal perceptions and by sent and received emissions at any sense or level which produce those well-being sensations.

What about sons? They are not around us because of good times wasted, at least at the moment, neither because we sympathise with them nor because of their personality, we don´t meet them.

Sons are around us because of the homesick towards them, by instinct, because it is the normal thing, and because in the opposite case, we feel a kind of absence, unless ideas led us to the contrary option. But sometimes, we need sons around us because they are as the maintenance on oneself. Other times because they are the same flesh we are, because of education, because God rules it, because it represents and adventure to have sons, because you like it, because you spend a good time or/ and because of a mistake in anti-conception, and so many more cases. Bear in mind that in few cases, or almost never it is because sons are, sons develop and sons enjoy existing instead that is presupposed later or become proved or not. We usually have sons around us because we need they give response to our expectations. On the contrary case, we become frustrated in our aims. We are not doing things in this manner with the main purpose of their own enjoyment and happiness.

But, what do you think about love? the more sublime one, that in which you give all yourself in the change for demanding nothing, that sacrificing love that makes people gives life to the rest uninterestingly.

What is the real one?. People usually never surrender fully to love, but the more uninterested love finds justification in other concepts. In order to understand all this, we must say that a partial behaviour, which apparently do not produce satisfaction is always subject to a compensation or to a higher compensation.

But are you telling me that those people suffering persecutions and martyrdoms obtain satisfaction in that?.

Well, as we have said previously, satisfaction can be both physical and psychical, or even concurrent. Both kinds of satisfaction can also influence, harmonize and be opposed the other one, thus satisfaction can gratify, satisfy, compensate, provide happiness for people to make good things, protect ideals, frighten, to suffer hits as masochist people, or whatever else. Everything about satisfaction depends on instinct, personality, feelings, thrusts, educational values, personal experience, circumstances, knowledge, and a mixture of all said. They produce thoughts, ideas, tastes… and the serenity that more or less consciously or unconsciously give them as a result, drive us to carry out all these tendencies and the profits resulting on that, avoiding to feel upset. As a result, we have several consequences that we can take into account or not, that even lead us to search a higher greeting, compensation or satisfaction.

And, what is the higher greeting we can be wishing?

Heaven, we believe that owing to doing or not doing things and owing to religious beliefs, we can become an state or aspire to a place where we are going to be all right or where everything is going to be greet and happiness: heaven. ¿do exist the possibility of a higher satisfaction reward or promise?

We have said compensation can come from outwards, as heaven, or from inwards the individual, as for example those things that can not be the result of well done, aims, and successful expectations. But in other cases dealt with, compensation can come, according to us, from tastes, beliefs and ideas, already dealt with previously, and existing genetics, educational basis, and manners. They give thus sensations, chemical and soul reactions which influence awarding or punishing us, making us to feel good or to feel bad. If not, as has been said, a higher recompense can be the option of our search and wish.

But do not compare among compensations, according to explained words, there is a great difference in being compensated by any one of them.

Of course I have explained you the ruling mechanisms of these performances. They can be evaluated for establish a difference among them: better one, worse, very good, very bad… although everybody does whatever is going to compensate him/her more, or whatever he things is going to do so.

Possible ending for the article

But if everyone does what more compensate him/her this becomes a disaster.

It is not a disaster because doing what compensates do not imply that to be bad. Therefore, performing in a compensative way implies satisfaction, so it drives to full satisfaction, it drives to happiness, and that is a good thing, not a bad one. The contrary case, not follow that things compensate us and satisfy us implies dissatisfaction, and consequently, a difference between expectation and reality, frustration.

Hence, what compensates somebody can be at the same time good for the rest. We can get the compensation of good and avoid the compensation of bad for someone else, and obtain compensation on friendship, love, earnestness, common health, tolerance… Respecting somebody, we can build for him a positive value scale, that in my opinion, it is the best for everybody. Here is the importance on the role of compensations in education, as in every field: therapeutic, sanitary… It is important for to build and modify behaviours, important for more surfacing things such as advertising or business, and important for all human relationships in general terms, and for everything, because that is life, that is the becoming of life, and everything, fully everything, not just the mankind is ruled by the Compenstaion´s Law but everything, even bigger organizations existing and being developed. They will be ruled by the same principles of smaller organizations and organisms, taking part into them. Also associations among previous groups and societies, possibilities among organisms, beings and all types of organizations will be also ruled, even the whole universe.

It will be ruled also artificial matter with compensation of forces: attractive forces (gravity, centrifugal, among bodies), repellent forces (centripetal, repulsive), and the rest amount of laws, tendencies, conditionings.. But also it will be ruled the animate world: plants, animals, satisfying their laws, heritance, instinct and needs. Even it will be ruled the man, belonging to these phases. The man, having into account what has been said before about him and about his own nature always tends to get those things more compensates and satisfies him trying to arrive to the highest level of compensation, happiness. Hence, satisfaction is the ruler of everything. At the same time, nature is ruled by compensation (even storms and catastrophes are macro-regulative that for the human eye are and seem high and serious disasters, the same is an atomic storm for an atom). Far from reality, those disasters are just a balance and an unsteadiness provoked and ruled by compensation of forces.

Nature with all its beings and the rest of things is ruled by a double mechanism

1- Ensuring that it is done what satisfies all premises according to development, evolution, prosperity and improving.

2- Nature supervises in a satisfactory way for its creatures whatever must be done for the compensative reality (to feed, procreate, adjustment of the environment and adaptation to the environment. This fact is what makes possible the survival of species and individuals, their evolution satisfying to the environment and being satisfied by them. In other words. Nature is ruled and it rules things doing in a satisfactory way what is necessary to do. According to this, intentionality implies survival, development, evolution, improving, and at the same time species and individuals who evolve and find the way to satisfy themselves by nature as if a survival mechanism, evolution, development and perfection is dealt.

As if it would be attained a certain intentionality, or just a simple chance, but because of the given mechanism itself, I would like to offer a toffee for to sweet and make tasteful the matter dealt and, thus, by offering the sweet to prove that exist satisfaction in the perform of the aim and mechanism.

-As a result, everything is a crap!

But also it could be the prettiest and marvellous reality. It depends on the glass it is viewed. It can seem the worse thing or the best, as life itself, as everything. According to our evaluation we reach the answer to the following question: what is nobler than to do that more compensates us in life? We can add an optimistic touch explaining that what more compensate and satisfy us is love itself, or friendship, or common-well. Is it a bad purpose? It is what it is, neither good nor bad it is Nature´s mechanism, the ruler of everything, the ruler of life.

Email: mamolaspina@gmail.com

Main Menu

See Also

Main Menu